England’s attack-at-all-costs philosophy needed to adapt, and it has. How will it acquit itself against the acid test that Australia will throw at it?
Greg Chappell18-Nov-2025The Ashes in Australia has always served as Test cricket’s most unforgiving crucible, and for England, the coming series offers the ultimate stress test. Under the stewardship of Brendon McCullum and Ben Stokes, they have undergone a profound psychological and stylistic shift.The name “Bazball” came about informally, coined by ESPNcricinfo’s UK editor Andrew Miller in the summer of 2022, shortly after McCullum was appointed head coach alongside new captain Stokes. McCullum, a naturally aggressive player, and Stokes, a captain defined by his proactive approach, provided the perfect psychological environment for this new style to flourish.The philosophy, at its heart, was about giving players mental freedom and eliminating the fear of failure. It was intended to import the fearless, results-oriented methodology of short-form cricket into the five-day game, resulting in an unprecedented run rate of 4.8 per over until mid-2023. Bazball must now mature if it is to succeed against the pace, bounce, and the Australian milieu.Related
Ashes FAQ: Do England really have a chance?
Pope hopes No.3 scrutiny can bring out his best for Ashes
Harry Brook is going to the Ashes with a clear mind, but how will he fare there?
Will Australia's pitches be juicy for the Ashes?
Duckett: England evolving from being 'entertaining, reckless at times'
This proactive style yielded immediate, sensational outcomes in England. It was liberating for a team that had long struggled. They transitioned from a dismal 6% win rate in the 17 Tests prior to the regime change to a robust 61% success rate overall since. The highs were dramatic, epitomised by a run of record-breaking fourth-innings chases in 2022, where England successfully hunted down four targets of 275-plus, including a monumental 378 runs against India. Their bold declaration against Pakistan in Rawalpindi later that year, giving the hosts a tempting target of 343 runs that eventually led to a memorable 74-run England victory, was immediately hailed as proof of the positive, find-a-way-to-win mentality.However, a deeper analysis reveals a stark geographical dependence that exposes the limits of Bazball 1.0. England’s win rate at home starting with the 2022 summer has been 68%, but away, this figure is 50% – a 26% gap that suggests the revolution is dependent on neutered designer pitches.This statistical difference is directly linked to the environmental context of English cricket. The home success of Bazball has hinged on wickets deliberately prepared to be flatter and more benign than traditional English seaming Test pitches. Stokes explicitly requested fast and flat pitches upon assuming the captaincy, leading to surfaces that minimised the lateral movement that once defined the challenge of playing in England. James Anderson, the master of seam and swing, publicly lamented that the Edgbaston pitch for the 2023 Ashes Test was “like kryptonite” for him, confirming the conditions were hostile to traditional seam-bowling skills.Furthermore, the shorter boundaries at many English Test grounds, which are exempt from strict minimum-size rules, fundamentally mitigate the risk inherent in frenetic batting. An aggressive horizontal-bat shot that clears a short square boundary in England might be caught easily on the expansive fields of Australia.9:19
How should England line up for the first Test?
The inevitable consequences of this high-risk strategy, when those environmental cushions are removed, are spectacular collapses. The team’s rapid implosion against India in Rajkot, where a strong position of 224 for 2 turned into 319 all out, and the stunning eight-wicket defeat against Sri Lanka at home – labelled by some as the worst batting of the Bazball era – serve as stark reminders of the volatility inherent in the approach. Bazball cannot become an excuse to avoid doing the hard yards that Test cricket demands.The key narrative heading into this Ashes series is that England have learnt this lesson and are now moving away from the unbridled, all-out assault of Bazball 1.0.England opener Ben Duckett, a key beneficiary of the aggressive approach, who has averaged 49 (with a strike rate of 87) in home Tests, recently confirmed that the side is evolving from being “entertaining, reckless at times”. Instead, the focus is on a strategic maturation: “reading moments”. Duckett cited the need to “just get through it” when facing five difficult overs at the end of a day, prioritising survival so as to be present the next morning rather than seeking runs at all costs.This subtle, but critical, evolution has not gone unnoticed by the opposition. Australia spinner Nathan Lyon observed that England are now “thinking about ways to win games, not being totally reckless”, while Steve Smith has said England have started to play the situation. This shift, from “reckless entertainment” to disciplined, high-intent positivity – marks the necessary birth of Bazball 2.0.The Australian challenge will be severe. The pitches, starting with the pace and true bounce of Perth, are ideal for an even contest between bat and ball. These are surfaces that reward discipline and sound judgement.While Australia have suffered the loss of Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood to injury for the opening Test, their veteran pace unit remains skilful enough to punish reckless batting. The core of the attack – Mitchell Starc, Scott Boland and the indefatigable Lyon – are key parts of one of the most enduringly successful bowling units in history. Hazlewood’s loss, on top of that of Cummins, is disappointing for the sake of the series. Hazlewood is arguably the most dangerous bowler against batters bearing a purely aggressive mindset. His absence in Perth will be dispiriting for Australia and noticeable.7:41
What can we expect from Harry Brook on his first Ashes tour?
The outcome of this series will pivot on how England’s top order navigates the conditions in Perth and Brisbane.Zak Crawley has been persevered with specifically because he is seen as someone who will flourish on the bouncy wickets with his stand-and-deliver methods. However, he will need immense discretion; attempting to drive too freely on the up against the extra bounce on Australian wickets will see him nick off regularly. Duckett, while he has bloomed in the Bazball era, will find that partnerships become more important than explosive starts, demanding he focus on absorbing pressure as much as on scoring quickly.Meanwhile Ollie Pope, who often seems to be under constant pressure to hold his spot, will need a strong showing in the first two Tests. Should he fail to score significant runs, the calls for the exciting but unproven young talent Jacob Bethell to replace him will inevitably grow louder.Joe Root remains the established star, a bedrock of consistency whom the others will lean on. Harry Brook, the cricket meteor on the rise, is arguably England’s greatest batting prospect. With his minimal movement at the crease and ability to use the angle of the delivery, he reminds me of a young Sachin Tendulkar. Brook’s record is similar (better, in fact) to Tendulkar’s at the same stage of his career. If this burgeoning superstar can adapt quickly to the conditions and temper his ambition with discretion, he could cement his reputation as a world-class talent. Jamie Smith is another exciting batter but one who needs to forget his recent poor New Zealand form.The England team that takes the field in Australia will still be upbeat. We should not expect to see their unbridled early days of Bazball 1.0 again. What we should expect, however, is a fiercely competitive bunch who have finally matured into a tough, aggressive, and calculating unit. Their success will not be measured by run rate but by their willingness to buckle down and undertake the hard work that is required in the demanding conditions of Australia.With the loss of Cummins and Hazlewood for Perth, the balance has shifted inexorably towards England.
